“THE WOMAN IN BLACK”
Based upon the novel by Susan Hill
Screenplay Written by Jane Goldman
Directed by James Watkins
** (two stars)
Dear readers, I would like for you to gaze at the above
photo for a few moments. As you gaze, I would like for you to then, mentally
add in some quietly ominous music and a few booming sound effects designed to
make you shiver and jolt upright. And voila!
You have essentially seen this entire movie!
Now, I certainly did not mean to sound so harsh. That
opening was merely a bit of fun from me to you but I can understand that based upon
that above paragraph and description, you would think that Director James
Watkins’ “The Woman In Black” would easily end up on my 2012 Worst Of The Year List.
Well…truth be told, the film really isn’t that bad. In fact, it’s not a bad
film at all. It’s just one that really did not leave much of an impression upon
me in any way, and that was despite the obvious skill, artistry and most of
all, restraint that was on display throughout. “The Woman In Black” is an
old-fashioned horror film, the kind that is meant to elicit chills up and down
the spine and not created to bludgeon the audience with unspeakable depravity
and over the top violence. While that is admirable, and at times quite
enjoyable, it was also a film that unfortunately did not stick to the cinematic
ribs by any means.
Set during the Edwardian period, Daniel Radcliffe stars as Arthur
Kipps, a young lawyer and widower consumed in the deep throes of grief after
his wife died while giving birth to his son Joseph, now aged 4. With his
mournful distractions now placing his career on the line, Arthur is dispatched
to a small remote town set just outside of London
to obtain and compile all of the paperwork from a recently deceased eccentric in
order to sell her large manor known as Eel Marsh House. Yet, tragically strange
occurrences have enveloped the town and all of the residents are mum to any of
its dreadful secrets and more than a little wary of this new visitor except for
the kindly Sam Daily (a strong Ciaran Hinds) who quickly befriends Arthur.
While Arthur spend copious amounts of solitude at the Eel
Marsh House, he soon discovers that the mansion is haunted by the tormented
spirit of a woman still desperate to reclaim what was once lost…and to forever wreak
her vengeance upon the town
As an old-fashioned gothic thriller, “The Woman in Black” is
a handsome production. It is an elegant film that is well guided and
orchestrated under Watkins’ rock steady directorial hand. The film does
accomplish an impressive job of evoking a tense, grim atmosphere and it provides
more than its share of “Don’t open that door!,” “Don’t go up the stairs!,” and
“Don’t go into that room!” moments. Much praise should be delivered to
Cinematographer Tim Maurice-Jones, as well as the members of Watkins’ set
design and most notably, the sound effects team, for successfully enveloping
the audience in a cloud of encroaching doom.
I found it to be a very classy move that “The Woman In
Black” operates and relies mostly upon a slow burn rather than falling back on
gratuitous gore, of which there is none in this film. Watkins remains ever
tactful and tasteful, especially when confronting the issue of having the lives
of various children in jeopardy, typically a cheap and mean spirited cinematic trick.
Although, the film possesses these fine qualities, they do, however, work
against the film’s overall impact.
Dear readers, you all know so very well about me that my
relationship with horror films in general is an extremely tentative one at best
and that I tend to give that genre an enormously wide berth as I just do not
enjoy the sensation of being frightened. All of that being said, and I am
certain that you will be mighty surprised by the following statement, but for
me, “The Woman In Black” is just not that scary! While I have to say that I did
jump up from my seated position several times throughout the film, I do think that
it had much, much less to do with actually being trapped in a state of fear and
dread and much more to do with the effectiveness of that aforementioned sound
design team. While I loved how Watkins utilized the sounds of silence throughout
the film, it seemed to exist just to have loud sounds jolt and shock you and
when attempting to create horror, technical effects just aren’t enough for me.
Beyond any technical issues, and while the film overall does
contain a certain level of suspense and functions well as a decent ghost story,
I just had this nagging feeling that “The Woman In Black” was all much ado
about nothing. This feeling really became enhanced for me by a hokum ending
that for me, deflated the proceedings when I would gather, the suspense and
terror needed to rise to a fever pitch. In this way, “The Woman In Black”
reminded me very much of my reaction to Director Alejandro Amenabar’s “The
Others” (2001), another atmospheric, gothic, disturbingly psychological,
visually arresting yet decidedly underwhelming thriller. Watkins definitely has
storytelling skill and visual panache but somehow, someway, the film never
delved underneath my skin or burrowed deep into my psyche to make me really
feel unhinged or at least troubled. Everything in the film seemed to sit very
attractively on the screen yet it all felt to be superficial as I just did not
have much of an emotional response.
From an acting standpoint, all of the performances are right
on point and work in complete conjunction with the darkly spectral
surroundings. I really liked seeing character actor Ciaran Hinds as he always
elicits strong performances and his scenes with Daniel Radcliffe showed that
the two men make for a strong acting team. But of course, there is the work of
Mr. Radcliffe to speak of, which also contains some pluses and minuses.
In his first, post “Harry Potter” film role Daniel Radcliffe
performs a worthy job, although most of his role has him exist in an often
wordless and mostly reactionary position. On the positive side, Radcliffe is
showing a newfound sense of maturity on-screen. He is able to easily convince that
he is of a certain time period and his ability to seem authentic is good. Additionally,
as Radcliffe is often alone during lengthy stretches of “The Woman In Black,”
it is commendable that he has shown the growth to be able to hold the screen
and our full attention regardless of the supernatural suspense occurring around
him. His growing skill as an actor is always a pleasure to watch and makes me
anxious to see what else he just may be able to pull off.
The downside is really not Radcliffe’s fault at all. Perhaps
his casting in this particular film was somewhat of a canny Hollywood
move as the supernatural elements of the story do happen to cross paths with
the supernatural elements of the “Harry Potter” series, therefore creating an
easy bridge for potential audiences to cross in regards to accepting Radcliffe
in a new role. But, that did present some minor problems here and there. As Radcliffe
as Arthur Kipps creeps through a dark, shivering, foreboding haunted house
seeking answers to the truth of the titular “woman in black,” there were several
points when I could not help but to think that he just might utter an ”Accio Wand!” or “Lumos!” for old time’s sakes. That close character/conceptual
proximity did make for a distraction that, at times, took me out of the story. Beyond
that, there really is not much within the character of Arthur Kipps that I
found to be truly compelling, which unfortunately gave Radcliffe not much else
to do other than creep around the dark, shivering, foreboding haunted house and
again, react to whatever the special effects and sound effects team hurl at
him. It’s a role that I felt to be quite underwritten as well as a little
bland, which makes for a performance that is kind of empty as there is no real
sufficient weight to latch onto.
Before I put this review into the hopper dear readers, I
have to ask if any of you remember an old comedy routine by Eddie Murphy
pertaining to the role of African Americans in the horror film genre and
essentially how no films of that sort would exist with Black people on the
leads. Why not? Well, Murphy reasoned, after a Black family entered and adored
their new, wonderfully luxurious home and then heard the very first disembodied
howl of “GET OUT!!,” any sensible Black
person would simply say, “Too bad we can’t stay!” Thus, the movie would be over
instantly. I shared that memory with you because I actually thought of that
very routine as I watched “The Woman In Black.” Not as a way to denigrate or poke holes
through the experience but to illustrate that despite its flaws, the film does
have its share of suspenseful sequences that are fun to wade through.
But if you are looking for horror, and I mean true,
debilitating horror, this film is just not quite up for the job.
I truly dislike the horror genre and I would not have lumped this movie into that category in any way. This was a traditional ghost story, meant to leave most to the imagination. I agree, if you are looking for horror this is NOT it. But if you like a great campfire ghost story, this movie hit the mark for me.
ReplyDelete