Sunday, June 10, 2012

ASHES TO ASHES: a review of "Prometheus"


“PROMETHEUS”
Screenplay Written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof
Directed by Ridley Scott
**** (four stars)

“Did You make disease and the diamond blue? Did You make mankind after we made You?”
 -XTC ("Dear God")

Leave it to the masters to get the job done!!

“Prometheus,” Director Ridley Scott’s return to the science fiction universe, which he has not visited since “Blade Runner” thirty years ago, is sensational! For all of the ink spilled about whether this film is a prequel or side story set in the universe that gave birth to Scott's “Alien” (1979), I will neither confirm nor deny, as I want for you to head out as soon as you are able and experience this film for yourselves. But I cannot express enough what a hell of an experience “Prometheus” happens to be as this is science fiction performed with a brain, heart, inventiveness, imagination and a feral intensity. While I have not necessarily been eagerly awaiting Scott’s return to outer space, what I have been anxiously awaiting is his return to creating the type of excellent, visionary films that have creatively eluded him in recent years, in my opinion. That said, it is obvious the return to the stars and far away planets has rejuvenated him heroically and most surprisingly, for a film that contains such a bleak and even fatalistic view of humanity and beyond, it is amazing how rapturous the experience actually is.

For the purposes of keeping a conceptually tight lid on the proceedings, I’ll be brief. “Prometheus” is set, very appropriately, near Christmastime in the year 2093. Focusing entirely upon the 17-member crew of the eponymously named spacecraft, we follow the shared scientific journey of Dr. Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Dr. Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), lovers who seek the answers to our existence but through fundamentally different ideological beliefs as Shaw is driven by her faith while the skeptic Holloway is fueled strictly through science. In addition to Shaw and Holloway are Janek (the smoldering Idris Elba), the ship’s captain, Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron), the embittered icy corporate suit and David (Michael Fassbender), the ship’s android with his own agenda.

Following a star map made from cave drawing from ancient civilizations, the Prometheus is led to a distant and advanced world hoping to discover our origins but instead find the deadliest threat to humankind of all.

That is actually as far as I feel that I can go with the plot description without producing spoilers. But, I will say this: “Prometheus” is thankfully yet another big budget Hollywood feature released this year that is focused upon story and storytelling, characters and performances, and combined with supremely delivered sound and vision. While the film more than fulfills any sense of scares, thrills and excitement, “Prometheus” is not designed to be a soulless, bludgeoning movie going experience. This film sets out to give you nothing less than awe, and while some of the pieces do not fit together entirely smoothly, the overall effect was blistering and boldly operatic. This particular stylistic tactic feels more than appropriate as Scott and his screenwriters have hefty philosophical issues and debates on their minds from man’s sense of uncontrollable hubris, our simultaneously joyous and terrifying desire for discovery and dead center is an emotional and intellectual war between science and faith. 

In many ways, “Prometheus” reminded me very much of science fiction films from the pre “Star Wars” past, that were devoted to ideas rather than interstellar bombast and to that end, Scott has envisioned an extremely unforgiving existence. For the characters, who are hoping to find a discovery meant to uplift and explain why we exist, Scott counters those sentiments with a cruel world of duplicitousness, destruction, death, and the potential for absolute nothingness after we pass on.

“Prometheus” illustrates a world of unrepentant meaninglessness where in one’s potentially final moments, you can find yourself literally watching your dreams projected upon a video screen while your most horrific nightmares are hunting you down in the flesh. The mass of ironies pile upwards throughout the film, yet wisely, “Prometheus” provides no absolute answers and frankly, how could it really? But, the feverish pursuit of answers is highly effective and deeply compelling and I will offer the following: I did love how “Prometheus” not only shared but merged themes he previously explored in both “Alien” and “Blade Runner” in regards to our relationship with machines and whether machines possess any sense of soul at all.

Yet, for all of the philosophical debates, Scott certainly does not skimp with giving the audience a fantastic post “Star Wars” bang for its collective buck. One sequence, which finds Shaw trapped inside a pod with a nasty invader, is flat out jaw dropping. A battle inside the ship’s loading deck area between crew members is a true pulse pounder. And the film’s mammoth climax shakes the theater valiantly. Ridley Scott executes a first rate production with gorgeous set design, crisp visual design from ace Cinematographer Dariusz Wolski, top of the line special effects, and a propulsive music score from Composer Marc Streitenfeld.

The casting, overall, was terrific as well. Theron and Elba made the very most of their archetypal characters and injected true moments of realistic human behavior. Michael Fassbender, as the android David, who fashions himself after Peter O’Toole from David Lean’s “Lawrence Of Arabia” (1962), gives one of the film’s finest performances as his motives are understandable but not always readable. He is sinister yet sympathetic and provides the film’s best counterpoint to the woman of faith, Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, as they both show unstoppable survival instincts, for surprisingly similar reasons.   
 
But the true star of the film is Noomi Rapace and kudos to Ridley Scott for giving her an avenue to show American audiences, who may have not seen her in the original Swedish “The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo” (2009) and it two sequels, what she’s made of. Scott beautifully rights the cinematic wrongs done to Rapace in Guy Ritchie’s underwhelming “Sherlock Holmes: A Game Of Shadows” (2011), where he had someone as formidable as Rapace relegated to just playing “the girl sidekick.” For “Prometheus,” Rapace is front and center and her performance is a marvel physically and emotionally. This is how you utilize someone of Rapace’s voluminous talents in a film and she shows again that she is a force of nature. Noomi Rapace will blow you over!   

Oh, but enough from me for now. “Prometheus” is the real deal, an awesome roof raising ride into the mouth of Hell. And it was a spectacular reunion for me with the artistic vision of Ridley Scott who has truly not impressed me with a feature since his iconic “Thelma and Louise” (1991). Here, Ridley Scott is ready to shake you up again. To give you even more than you may be expecting. To forge ahead into the darkness completely unafraid and armed with a malevolent grin, testing us to see if we can handle what he’ll dish out for us.

Not only will you be able to handle “Prometheus,” you will most likely ask for seconds!!     

Thursday, June 7, 2012

POWER TRIP: a review of "Chronicle"



“CHRONICLE”
Story by Max Landis and Josh Trank
Screenplay Written by Max Landis
Directed by Josh Trank
***1/2 (three and a half stars)

Since you’ve all seen “The Avengers,” now, it’s time to check out what could be its dark underbelly.

While there is no way to know with any absolute certainty and based upon just this film, I do have a strong feeling that the name Josh Trank is one we may be hearing from in the film world. A lot! Dear readers, I make this statement because I feel that it is rare to see a film directorial debut as sure-footed, conceptually strong, visually striking and as entirely impressive as this one.

“Chronicle,” the first feature from filmmaker Josh Trank is all of those aforementioned qualities and so much more as he and screenwriter Max Landis have fashioned an instantly involving tale that remarkably combines four different genres-- the science fiction thriller, an intimate family drama, a teen comedy and the superhero origin story--into a vibrantly resonant whole. “Chronicle” was released very quietly in theaters during the usually cinematically dry month of February and it became a surprise smash hit. Now, that “Chronicle” has been released on DVD, now is your chance to see what the rumblings have been about and I am here to tell you that this is a movie risk that you will definitely want to take.

As “Chronicle” opens, we are introduced to Andrew Detmer (a gripping Dane DeHaan) who has purchased for himself a video camera and has begun the task of documenting every moment of his sad life, which the audience views entirely through the camera eye. While Andrew’s Mother (Bo Peterson) is slowly dying of cancer, Andrew is a victim of abuse by his alcoholic Father (Michael Kelly), a firefighter, currently unemployed and collecting disability due to an injury. At school, life is not any better as Andrew is a constant target for bullying and aside from his cousin Matt (Alex Russell), he has no friends to speak of. 

One afternoon, Matt invites Andrew to accompany him to a rave party, with the hopes that Andrew could possibly meet people, gain friends and perhaps even a girlfriend. Andrew reluctantly agrees and true to form, he brings along with camera, which angers some party goers to the point where Andrew is ejected. While he sits tearfully despondent outdoors, Andrew is soon approached by the very popular Senior, and Student Body president candidate, Steven (an excellent Michael B. Jordan). Steven excitedly requests Andrew’s presence to join himself and Matt at a nearby location in the woods and to definitely bring his camera.  

The threesome discover a giant hole in the ground, which is emitting strange loud sounds and crackles. They descend into the hole and soon discover a bizarre, giant object that shines a sinisterly luminous blue glow. As Steven approaches and touches the object, the sounds begins to grow louder, the object begins to change color from blue to red and as the boys all experience profound nose bleeds, Andrew’s camera cuts to black.

When the camera’s eye reopens, the three boys are transformed. With no reasonable explanations as to how or why, all three have gained the power of telekinesis. At first, we witness Andrew, Matt and Steven engage in “Jackass” styled hijinks with each other as well as hidden pranks in public. And soon, they discover that they have each gained the ability to fly!

Yet hubris begins to overtake the troubled Andrew, especially as his home and inner life grows more dire. A moment of road rage becomes deadly. His desperate moves to save his Mother’s life become devastating. And his friendships grow increasingly fractured and ultimately, tragic.

Josh Trank’s “Chronicle” was a true cinematic surprise that had me involved from the very first frame to its stirring final image. It felt obvious to me that I was in the directorial hands of someone who truly and seriously thought out every image of his film carefully and artfully, ensuring that a supreme visual, and therefore, emotional experience was to be gained. I loved how he and Landis were able to merge the ordinary and everyday and make the fantastical arrive with such awe and heft that the very familiar movie images of flight, levitation and epic cataclysm felt wholly fresh again.

The film’s special effects are truly special as they felt to be so photo realistic, possibly the very best of its kind that I have seen since the extraordinary work displayed in Director Neill Blomkamp’s incredible “District 9” (2009). Trank has shown that while he may not hold the $200 million dollar budgets of many fantasy films made these days, he has schooled them all by showing how to take a comparatively meager budget and spin gold. Trank and his team have exhibited a level of creativity, skill and showmanship that should be a lesson to all budding filmmakers as well as established filmmakers who have grown jaded. Trunk’s vision is clear eyed and vibrantly executed and I appreciated how he was able to utilize small means to create something grand.

While the concept of creating a film, which is told entirely through the characters’ “found footage” is not remotely new, Trank again found a way to make the technique feel fresh and unique. As with Director’s Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez’s” The Blair Witch Project” (1999), which essentially created something from absolutely nothing, the found footage serves the same purpose but thankfully, the dreaded shaky cam does not make much of an appearance! On the contrary, the cinematography of “Chronicle” is fluid, smooth and at times quite elegant as Andrew spends much of the film levitating and manipulating his camera artfully as if he is creating the movie of his life starring himself except that it is really happening.

More importantly, I think that Trank has conceptually tapped into a cultural critique that is not far removed from Director David Fincher’s “The Social Network” (2010). Very cleverly, Trank explores and questions how our 21st century over-reliance on technology in regards to documenting oneself as well as publicly over-sharing has increased especially at the expense of relating to other people face-to-face and soul-to-soul. Throughout the film, Steven and the once very reluctant Matt each take turns filming their exploits and adventures. Additionally, there is another character, a Senior student named Casey (Ashley Hinsaw), who writes her own blog and is also often seen with her own camera.

Yet, the most crucial relationship is between Andrew and the camera. One character remarks to him that it is as if he is using the camera as a “barrier,” to which he replies, “Maybe I want a barrier.” In Andrew’s miserable world, it all makes sense as the camera is a protective shield for him as well as an ever present yet completely silent and entirely non-judgmental confidant. The camera never talks back, disappoints, or criticizes. It is all accepting no matter what you bring to it. Unfortunately, in the case of Andrew, despite his understandable pain and torment, this all acceptance ends up doing nothing but serves to fuel his building sense of undisciplined hubris and ultimate megalomania, which is beautifully acted via a richly layered performance by Dane DeHaan. But, a bit more on him later… 

In many ways, “Chronicle” reminded me of the very best elements of television’s “Heroes” series from Tim Kring and even moreso of M. Night Shyamalan’s finest film, the grim superhero origin tale, “Unbreakable” (2000) as they each featured ordinary, everyday people suddenly blessed or cursed with supernatural abilities. Trank and Landis performed an excellent job of making all three of the teenage characters realistic, relatable and multifaceted and all three young actors gave rich performances to boot. As Steven, Michael B. Jordan (from the first season of HBO’s “The Wire” and Director Anthony Hemingway and George Lucas’ “Red Tails”) brought warmth, humor and style to a role that could have easily been nothing more than the bland popular kid. There is a slyness and effortless ease to his line readings that feel completely natural. It is as if his lines of dialogue were his actual words he spoke on the set on the day of filming. His friendship with the troubled Andrew provides the film with a tentative bittersweetness as if we all know that this is a relationship that cannot last for very long.

As the equally sensitive Matt, Alex Russell does a fine job as he provides his own subtle transformation as a purposefully introverted and somewhat exclusionary high school Senior with a penchant for exploring existential philosophy into one who eventually embraces a more public role, especially when the safety of others becomes threatened.

But the film’s major focus rests with Andrew and Dane DeHaan (who gave a blistering performance on one season of HBO’s “In Treatment” series) elicits a performance that begins as implosive, rockets towards explosive and is fully compassionate and darkly intense throughout. What is the odyssey of Andrew Detmer other than an especially grim version of Peter Parker’s transformation into Spider Man? Yet unlike that adage of Director Sam Raimi’s three adaptations of the web slinger: “With great power comes great responsibility,” that sentiment grows increasingly meaningless, especially for a teenager in the throes of such immense pain. DeHaan makes every single moment from the quiet to the monumental work successfully as he utilizes tremendous nuance, sympathy, and unrepentant vengeance, a crucial act to accomplish. On one hand, Andrew longs to fly to Tibet to attain an inner peace he is not able to have in his daily life. Yet on the other, his thirst for power grows to a stage where he envisions himself as nothing less than “the apex predator,” a being who elicits no guilt when inflicting pain upon those he deems to be weaker than himself. Like Josh Trank, Dane DeHaan is definitely an actor to watch very closely. His talent and skill is deeply impressive and he actually reminded me greatly of no less than a younger Leonardo DiCaprio.

So, after all of this enthusiastic praise, why not give this film four stars? Well, I simply cannot for no other reason than this film did not send me “over the top.” It is completely subjective but I always know a four star film when I see one. “Chronicle” comes very close but just misses by a hair. But, dear readers, I have a strong feeling that Josh Trank will not only be a cinematic name to remember but that he will be hitting cinematic home runs very, very soon.

Until that time, I highly recommend "Chronicle," which is more than worthy and fully deserving of your precious time! 

Sunday, June 3, 2012

SAVAGE CINEMA'S COMING ATTRACTIONS FOR JUNE 2012

It's going to be a busy month.

Dear readers, now the the Summer Movie Season has been fully unleashed, the releases during month of June are so plentiful that it is already daring me to keep up.

1. First and foremost, I am still awaiting the arrival of Wes Anderson's new film "Moonrise Kingdom" which has been gathering some of his strongest critical notices.

2. Of course, and without question, "Prometheus," Director Ridley Scott's return to science fiction films since the release of his classic "Blade Runner" thirty summers ago (!), is the highest on my must see list!

3. Pixar's latest film, "Brave" is just nipping at the heels of the previously mentioned selections I am anxious to see.

4. And I am also very excited about the new dark comedy "Seeking A Friend For The End Of The World" starring Steve Carell and Keira Knightley.

5. "To Rome With Love," Writer/Director Woody Allen's new release may arrive this month as well, yet another film that carries a high sense of anticipation for me as I seldom miss any new film from this filmmaking master.

6. And even then...I have some trepidacious curiosity for "Snow White and the Huntsman" as well as "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter." I am not fully sold on either film but my cinematic ears are perked.

That is a hefty load to carry and life permitting, I hope to have seen and reviewed as many of them as possible. At this time, I already have a new review in the hopper and it should be ready to post this week sometime. So, for the month of June, wish me luck and as always...

...I'll see you when the house lights go down.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

SAVAGE CINEMA'S FAVORITE MOVIES: "BOOGIE NIGHTS" (1997)


“BOOGIE NIGHTS” (1997)

Written and Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson

For this premiere installment of “Savage Cinema’s Favorite Movies,” I am so excited to present to you what I feel to be a towering cinematic achievement.

Paul Thomas Anderson’s “Boogie Nights” is the epitome of greatness to me as it is indeed one of the very best films of the 1990’s. It is also a film that completely transcends its own subject matter of the late 1970s/early 1980s porn film industry and provides a wholly empathetic, non-judgmental view of the various dreams and failures of a makeshift family embodied by a collective of societal cast offs. It is a heartbreaking experience, fully wrenching and at times unbearably intense but it is always, and I mean, always masterfully presented. “Boogie Nights” never strikes one false note or makes any wrong moves. It is a film that firmly announced the arrival of not only Mark Wahlberg as an actor to watch closely and take seriously but Anderson himself as a natural born filmmaker and storyteller who would eventually go on to make “Magnolia” (1999), “Punch-Drunk Love” (2002) and the ahead of its time “There Will Be Blood” (2007). This fall, Paul Thomas Anderson will return with “The Master,” his first film in five years and whose head scratching teaser trailer has recently hit the internet. But for now, I turn you to the sprawling epic “Boogie Nights,” which if you haven’t seen before, I cannot not urge you enough to get yourselves to viewing as it is essential watching.

For a filmmaker for whom “Boogie Nights” was only his second film, Paul Thomas Anderson knew exactly how to make an entrance and announce that his movie was going to be an experience unlike anything else. Opening innocuously on a black screen and softly with the sounds of Michael Penn’s score, a sad circus carousel-sounding cue, “Boogie Nights” blasts onto the glorious widescreen with the image of a movie theater marquee adorned with the film’s title and set to the blaring, brassy fanfare of The Emotions’ “Best Of My Love.”

Then, taking his cue from no less than Martin Scorsese’s “Goodfellas” (1990), Anderson, with the supreme confidence of a cinematic master, swoops his camera through a lengthy unbroken shot from the marquee across the 1977 San Fernando Valley nighttime streets and into a nightclub, owned by Maurice Rodriguez (a terrific Luiz Guzman). The camera continues to glide around the busy nightclub all the way from dark corner tables to the vibrant disco dance floor, as Anderson, as if taking on the role of a ringmaster, effortlessly introduces us to nearly the entire film’s cast. In addition to Maurice, we meet pornography film director Jack Horner (an excellent Burt Reynolds), his faithful paramour and porn film leading lady Amber Waves (Julianne Moore), as well as the otherwise nameless Rollergirl (Heather Graham), the porn film ingĂ©nue who never, ever takes off her roller skates. Next, we are introduced to fellow porn film actors Buck Swope (Don Cheadle) and Reed Rothchild (John C. Reilly) as well as cinematographer Little Bill (William H. Macy). The camera finally rests on a youthful, wide eyed figure lurking by the nightclub’s kitchen, the high school dropout and nightclub busboy, 17 year old Eddie Adams (Mark Wahlberg).

Outside of the nightclub, Eddie lives a sad life as he shares a home with his alcoholic Mother (a raging Joanna Gleason) and his cuckold of a Father. He works his days at a dead end job at a car wash. But, Eddie houses idealistically big dreams as he is determined to one day become a “big, bright shining star.” And…he also houses something else entirely…a mammoth 13 inch penis!

Always on the search for new talent, Jack Horner discovers Eddie at the nightclub, introduces him to Amber Waves and auditions him via a sexual tryst with Rollergirl. Sensing a potentially incredible new talent to assist him with helping him achieve his own dreams of creating a cinematic and artistic porn film triumph, Horner says to Eddie seductively, welcoming and encouragingly, “There’s something wonderful in those jeans just waiting to get out.”

After one final seismic blowout with his Mother, Eddie runs away from home and joins the porn film circus at Jack Horner’s compound, where he is finally indoctrinated to all of the previously introduced characters plus camera operator Kurt Longjohn (Ricky Jay), sound man and boom operator Scotty J. (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and the mysterious porn film financier Colonel James (the late Robert Ridgely) among others.

Eddie, who rechristens himself "Dirk Diggler," becomes an instant sensation, elevating the status of all around him as Horner’s films, featuring Dirk Diggler’s massive…ahem…talents, begin to win awards and pack X rated movie theaters. Big money also begins to flow into Dirk’s life, as he purchases a new home filled with the latest accoutrements, oodles of fashionable clothing and even a prized Corvette.

The remainder of “Boogie Nights” becomes a wild, wretched and relentlessly harrowing tale of success floundered and lost, with the hopeful dreams within all of the characters failing, falling and even dying with only the members of their makeshift family to cling to for support and survival.

When I first saw “Boogie Nights” during its initial theatrical run, it was nothing less than one of the most electrifying spectacles I had ever witnessed. Paul Thomas Anderson commands and orchestrates his motion picture with a superlative confidence and rock star swagger that is absolutely crucial for a movie like this one. In fact, “Boogie Nights" is actually quite a self aware experience as it fully knows from first image and the previously described opening scene to the film’s swirling curtain call and the priceless final image that it is a MOVIE!!

Anderson, as if he were P.T. Barnum, is the ultimate showman as he spins his conceptual and thematic plates in the air with extraordinary panache. It is a film that unapologetically swings for the fences as "Boogie Nights" is the epitome of theatrical. It is operatic in scope and emotional content as the events are grandly presented and overwhelmingly felt (a technique was used to even more devastating effect in "Magnolia").

Anderson’s music choices are brilliantly impeccable as he wisely chose selections that not only fit the time period but also cleverly comment upon the action. As Eddie first arrives at Jack Horner’s home to begin his porn odyssey, Anderson underscores the moments with Three Dog Night’s “Mama Told Me Not To Come.” As Little Bill finds his perpetually philandering porn star wife in the throes of yet another man, and even surrounded by an audience, Elvin Bishop’s “Fooled Around And Fell In Love” painfully plays in the background. In addition, Andrew Gold’s late 1970's AM radio classic “Lonely Boy” has never sounded more poignant. And believe me dear readers, if you have not seen this film before, Night Ranger’s “Sister Christian” and Rick Springfield’s “Jessie’s Girl” will never sound the same again.

The entire cast, from the very top to even the most seemingly minor players, deliver the goods and then some. Mark Wahlberg, in this Herculean role, is cinematic dynamite as Dirk Diggler. He completely nails the innocence and idealism of the film’s earlier sections and the crushing arrogance and larger-than-life downfall in the film’s latter half with incredible skill, heft, pathos and a boat load of humor, which walks a very thin line between hysterical and pathetic. Equally, the casting of Burt Reynolds was a masterstroke as his real life existence as a 1970’s sex symbol icon completely informs and grounds his role as Jack Horner. Like his porn filmmaker character, Reynolds, it could be assumed, has seen it all and throughout the film, he lords over the proceedings like a lion in winter with a bemused expression upon his face that winks at the audience while also never breaking character.

In addition to the two main leading roles, I was especially drawn to the high quality work delivered by Julianne Moore, William H. Macy, and Philip Seymour Hoffman as the sadly lovestruck Scotty J. who nurses a painful and unrequited crush on Dirk Diggler. In particular, I loved the masterful Don Cheadle who brings tremendous empathy to his character of Buck Swope, who is constantly searching for his perfect image and wardrobe to sell himself in a predominantly Caucasian environment and also houses big dreams of one day leaving the porn industry behind and owning and operating his own stereo store.

For those of you who have not seen this film and feel wary due to the subject matter, please allow me to assure you that “Boogie Nights” is not a film about pornography. In fact, for a film set within the inner workings of the porn film industry, Anderson never creates an experience designed to titillate or wallow in prurient fantasies. In a way, he demystifies sex and makes the act of sex completely technical and clinical. It was also surprising that if there is any sense of arousal at all within the film, it may exist in Dirk Diggler’s initial on-set filmed sex sequence with Amber Waves, which in turn is also deflated by the Oedipal tones contained within that sequence and characters.

In explanation of that last statement, and as previously referenced, “Boogie Nights” is essentially a film about a family of sorts. Jack Horner serves as the inspiring yet increasingly weary patriarchal figure while Amber Waves serves as the maternal force, especially as she takes Dirk and Rollergirl completely under her wings to compensate for her overwhelming sadness with being estranged from her own young son after her divorce. The inherent unhappiness contained within the interior lives of these characters gives them a sense of grace that one would not otherwise anticipate or suspect. Anderson goes to great lengths to ensure that everyone is a fully drawn, three dimensional human being. Therefore, he creates a canvas where we not only understand these people who happen to be making dirty movies together but we also sympathize with them and wish them wellness.

In addition to the big dreams that fuel the lives of Dirk Diggler, Jack Horner and Buck Swope, we learn that Reed Rothchild fashions himself as a magician, while Rollergirl may be housing dreams of becoming a photographer as she is often seen brandishing a camera. On a more wrenching scale, the aforementioned Amber Waves desperately wishes to reconnect with her child and Little Bill only wants to fully satisfy his wayward wife. With those characters and others, “Boogie Nights” details the drudgery and disappointments of the characters’ lives during the daylight hours and also their nights of glory where they all exist or (just believe themselves to be) world class stars.

To that end, “Boogie Nights” is an exploration of success and fame, and the illusions and delusions that lead to self-destruction. It is a film about spectacular failure. And like my beloved “Jerry Maguire” (1996), it is also a film about the pressures of keeping a sense of integrity and surviving within a rapidly changing industry due to the rapidly changing tenor of society. It was truly a risky move for Anderson to ask his audience to latch onto the lives of people whom, I would assume, many of us would dismiss, discredit, or even feel superior towards as we would never, ever do what they are doing. But I have to say that the emotional toll it placed upon me and other viewers was definitely palpable when I first saw it in the theater and remains so to this day.

For the film’s first half, "Boogie Nights" is a sun soaked ode to the promiscuous 1970s with free love, drugs and sex surrounding the events at lively afternoon pool parties at Jack Horner's home where all of the characters confess and share their deepest hopes and desires with each other. Anderson's visual palate is gorgeous as he and veteran Cinematographer Robert Elswit let the camera swoop, circle around and around and even dive into the swimming pool so we can nearly catch a contact high from the joyousness. Yet, amidst the sunshine, dark clouds lurk in a sinister fashion but are conveniently brushed out of the way as to not disrupt the fun. But the wolf is always at the door.

In one scene, a starlet overdoses at a party and is quickly ushered out of the party to the hospital through a back entrance. In another, Scotty J.'s romantic hopes towards Dirk leave him in a pool of painful embarrassment and Little Bill's tension with his philandering wife comes to a brutal head. Even the significance of Little Bill's nickname displays some crippling inner wounds dealing with his sense of feeling physically, emotionally and sexually insignificant towards his wife as well as to all of the porn film studs, most especially the ultra large membered Dirk Diggler to which he will never be able to compare. All of the dark energy which has been swirling under the surface throughout the first half of the film arrives with a shocker of a conclusion on New Year's Eve 1979, signifying nothing less than the party of the 1970s being officially and abruptly over.

The second half of the film, set in the early and socially regressive 1980's, packs a colossal wallop as Anderson magically creates the euphoric sensation of giving the audience a nearly orgiastic high the further down the characters descend and plunge. In addition to all of the previously mentioned themes and concepts, it is here where Anderson explores the theme and consequences that occur when what one performs as an occupation does not necessarily define that same person as human being. This fact severely haunts Rollergirl and Amber Waves for instance, and another character, previously seen as being fastidious, is eventually exposed as a purveyor of child pornography. And there is also the extremely painful sequence where another character is turned down for a loan simply because of their past association with the porn industry.

But, it is when “Boogie Nights” echoes “Goodfellas” once again as it nods to the climactic and relentless cocaine fueled paranoia of that film’s conclusion, where the Anderson keeps topping himself again and again, scaling new heights and unearthing an undeniably intense power. Anderson and his collaborators, through their expert, fluid, and restless camera work, editing, sound design and acting performances, ratchet up the tension as the film's collective characters make one wrong move after another or especially as they each confront their inner demons as the world rapidly changes around them. It is as if they are all surprised with how they ended up where they have ended up and the overall effect is as anguishing as it is exhilarating.

Witnessing Dirk Diggler’s epic fall due to a cocaine addiction combined with his out of control ego is akin to watching a superhero lose their powers as his mighty phallus lets him down time and again. One traumatic section, entitled “December 11, 1983,” is a powerhouse as Anderson crosscuts between two events that slowly percolate and boil into explosive violence and then, Anderson shifts his attention from those two storylines and veers towards a third which finds another character in a horrific twist of fate set inside of a donut shop.

But, nothing will ever prepare you for the film’s tour de force of a climax as three characters attempt to make a drug deal with a completely unhinged dealer (brilliantly portrayed by Alfred Molina) and his equally unhinged sidekick who randomly sets off firecrackers in the background. Anderson creates a sequence that constantly keeps you off kilter, entirely unnerved and on the edge of your seat no matter how many times you have seen it. It is a masterpiece of modern day “Hitchcockian” styled intensity.

And even then, at the conclusion of this two and half hour saga, Anderson delivers the “money shot” of “money shots,” ending his film on an unbelievable high with a scene so tragically pitiable.

For Paul Thomas Anderson’s “Boogie Nights,” it often feels as if the cinematic spirits of Martin Scorsese and the late Robert Altman (key sources of inspiration) were standing nearby guiding Anderson and his vision along. But most importantly, the film clearly established Anderson as a gifted filmmaker in his own right. His soaring talents would create works that demand to be witnessed and upheld as some of the finest American films of the previous 15 years.

“Boogie Nights” ends as it began, with the melancholy sounds of the circus leaving town, undoubtedly never to return to its boisterous glories. But, what a deliriously dazzling tapestry Paul Thomas Anderson has created and given to us to experience over and again. While I will concede that Anderson’s “Magnolia” and “There Will Be Blood” may even be better films, “Boogie Nights” remains my favorite film of his to date. It is the one that I return to the most. The one I can pop into my DVD player anytime at all and lose myself inside of. It is also the type of film, if I were in the fortunate position to make movies myself, that I would just kill to have been able to make for it is so amazing, stunning, and tremendous.

Withotu question, Paul Thomas Anderson’s “Boogie Nights” is one of my most favorite movies and if the hour were not so late, I would easily pop it into my DVD player and watch it all over again right now!!!

WELCOME TO SAVAGE CINEMA'S FAVORITE MOVIES

And now, I am so proud to present to you a brand new series on Savage Cinema.

Ever since the inception of this site, I have included a few series to run alongside the main film reviews with arrive through occasional features. Initially, I had "Savage Cinema's Short Takes," which essentially was nothing more than some very early reviews I had written that were profoundly shorter than what you are used to seeing on this site. That series was indeed short lived as there were not that many older reviews for me to transplant. By it's very design, "Short Takes" had a finite existence.

Around that same time, I decided to have a series entitled "Savage Cinema's Buried Treasure." That series was designed for me to spotlight certain films that I have enjoyed over the years but for some reason or another, these films may have been critically acclaimed but have been forgotten or may have lacked a certain historical longevity. Or they are films that were not widely seen or films which never really found much notoriety or an audience in the first place. This series has been a blast to write and I plan to continue it for as long as possible.

In addition to "Buried Treasure," I have also been slowly adding installments for "Savage Cinema Debuts," a series in which I write brand new reviews for films I had previously never seen. Also, I began "Savage Cinema Revisits," which I think would be more than self-explanatory.

In January of this year, I wrote two installments of "Savage Cinema Revisits" spotlighting two films from Stanley Kubrick: "The Shining" (1980) and "A Clockwork Orange" (1971). While writing the posting for "A Clockwork Orange," it hit me that I could add a new series to the fold. Inspired by Roger Ebert's "Great Movies" articles and book collections, I wanted to create a series where I would honor my most favorite films and thus was born the new venture that I am very excited to share with you.

"Savage Cinema's Favorite Movies" is the place where my praise will exist at its highest. These are the films which I will love for the rest of my days and of course, will encourage you to see, if you have not seen them already or to remember fondly, if you have seen them. As always, this site is meant to encourage a world of discussion and conversation between you and me and as always, these writings are solely my opinions.

At this time, I have the first entry ready to be published and I sincerely hope that you enjoy it and all future entries.

Enjoy!!! 

Sunday, May 20, 2012

MURDER BEHIND THE PINE CURTAIN OF CARTHAGE, TEXAS: a review of "Bernie"



“BERNIE”
Based upon a Texas Monthly article written by Skip Hollandsworth
Screenplay Written by Richard Linklater and Skip Hollandsworth
Directed by Richard Linklater
**** (four stars)

Now this was a enormous surprise!!!!

Dear readers, the pleasure of going to the movies, especially when I know little to nothing about it is one of life’s many gifts as far as I am concerned. It is such wonderful feeling to head into something without any pre-conceived notions and just allow yourself to be swept away by a great story. Writer/Director Richard Linklater’s “Bernie” is such a great story and it is a tale greatly told.

So far this year, I have awarded several films my highest rating of four stars and here is yet one more to join the bunch. I assure all of you that I am not feeling to be in a particularly generous mood as I do not take the award of four stars lightly. Whether my recent ratings speak to the overall quality of the 2012 cinematic year, I cannot be certain. To that end, which films will ultimately end up as my ten favorite films of 2012 remains to be seen, of course. But, all I can say is that I know for my own tastes and sensibilities, I know what works, what does not and how stories affect me as I watch them. “Bernie” is a film I could not find any fault with. It grabbed me instantly and carried me along with it effortlessly. I feel it is one of Richard Linklater’s most accessible and entertaining films, quite an achievement for a filmmaker as varied and idiosyncratic as he has been over the years. With selections like his groundbreaking debut feature “Slacker” (1991), which was followed by the likes of the seminal “Dazed and Confused” (1993), the gorgeously conversational, romantic and literate “Before Sunrise” (1995) and its sequel “Before Sunset” (2004), his esoteric, psychedelically animated and philosophical features “Waking Life” (2001) and “A Scanner Darkly” (2006) and of course, his mammoth crowd pleaser “School Of Rock” (2003), Linklater has continued to be a filmmaker who has completely followed his own artistic path without apologies…as well as he should! The joy of a filmmaker of Linklater’s status and abilities is that you will never know exactly where he will take you next. Certainly seeing his name attached to any new project piques my interest and in this case, knowing that he would be re-teaming with the incredible Jack Black indeed told me to get myself to the Sundance theater. What I received, as a result, was a work of excellence fueled by what I consider to be Jack Black’s finest and most realized performance to date.

To keep “Bernie” as fresh as possible for you, I will do my very best to not really reveal terribly much. Based upon a real life crime event, “Bernie” stars Jack Black as the titular Bernie Teide, a genteel, soft spoken, effeminate mortician who quickly and supremely ingratiates himself to the entire community of Carthage, Texas. His kindness, openness, generosity, respect for all, hard work ethic and complete excellence with his craft affords him a deep admiration and nearly iron clad reputation throughout the entire town, most particularly with the “little old ladies” he tends to keep his company with.

The formidable Shirley MacLaine portrays the wealthy widow Marjorie Nugent, utterly and completely despised throughout Carthage for her bottomless vitriol and endless meanness. Matthew McConaughey rounds out the main cast as local District Attorney Danny Buck Davidson, whose reputation for relentless crime fighting merged with a flair for opportunistic theatrics with the local media has garnered him a most skeptical status within the community. How these three lives intertwine, and how a real life murder occurred, can be found out once you get yourselves out to the theater and see this thing for yourselves!

This time, that’s all I am going to give you for I do want for you to take the time and spend your movie-going money on a film this strong. To give you even more of an excited push, the film “Bernie” reminded quite a bit of Clint Eastwood’s wonderful adaptation of “Midnight In The Garden Of Good and Evil” (1997), as he housed a murder within our immersion into the culture and characters of New Orleans. Furthermore, the film “Bernie” reminded me of the most was none other than The Coen brothers’ masterpiece, “Fargo” (1996). Yes, I do believe that Linklater’s latest is a film of this high quality. That film brilliantly merged a murder mystery and crime element with the life and regional flavor of wintry Minnesota, allowing the grim comedy and beating heart of the story and performances to lay directly within our immersion in this particular locale. “Bernie” supremely accomplishes the same feat. Yes, this is a film with crime and punishment at its core, but it a film that is really about a location and its inhabitants which is very unfamiliar to the rest of the country and perhaps, the world.

While I will get to the performance of Jack Black and his cast mates very shortly, I would offer that sticking to the film’s adherence to its location, the film’s greatest asset are Linklater’s generous inclusion of the wide variety of real life residents of Carthage, Texas who lived through this particular event and actually knew the real people. Linklater populates the film with interview segments starring the Carthage locals, allowing them to talk, talk, and talk some more, dropping their own priceless nuggets of town gossip and personal perceptions. Because of that crucial element, it feels as if we are receiving an oral history of Carthage, Texas. I assure all of you that this is not dry, tepid storytelling and filmmaking. Linklater ensures that all of those sequences and people are presented in a completely conversational fashion, creating a feeling as if they are speaking directly to you and revealing their town’s greatest secrets. With “Bernie” Linklater gives us the richness of real life and injects into the dream world of the cinema and it makes for compelling and often extremely funny storytelling.

Because of all of this lively banter from one end of the film to the other, Linklater ensure that his film becomes a story that is about so much more than a murder. “Bernie” is a story about popularity and public perceptions and how those elements play out during a horrific crime and the court of public opinion. What is a monster? Who is really a victim? And in the case of McConaughey’s District Attorney character, is he a man just doing his job, a bully or even a self-absorbed media whore out for even more attention with a high profile criminal case? Linklater never at any point makes this material ponderous or plodding. He keeps the proceedings flowing along with a breezy pace and style but he leaves you with much to mentally chomp upon once the final credits begin to scroll.

While MacLaine is truly a force of nature as the horrible Marjorie Nugent, she always ensure that this woman is understandably human and never presented as a cartoon. She is as razor sharp as she has ever been in the movies and it was a pleasure to witness her untouchable talents once again. Matthew McConaughey’s laconic style and subversive brand of humor served him extremely well in his role.

But, I must spend some time extolling my praise for the performance given by Jack Black, which I truly hope is remembered during awards season. Yes, he is that good. Black is someone whom I have admired and enjoyed for many, many years yet whose talents have not always been served well in the movies. While the wonderful “School Of Rock” and Stephen Frears’ outstanding adaptation of “High Fidelity” (2000) showcased Black’s talents supremely as they merged character with his unhinged rock maniac persona, I also felt that Peter Jackson utilized him very successfully by toning his antics down and forcing him to solely serve a character in his epic retelling of “King Kong” (2005). For “Bernie,” I feel that I have witnessed Black’s most realized, three dimensional performance to date as Linklater has taken all of Black’s impressive skills plus our own perceptions of him and funneled everything into this man, who while likeable also comes off as quite the enigma.

Just take a moment and picture Jack Black in your mind. And now imagine him as a soft spoken, impeccably dressed, meticulously professional, conservative and evangelical yet fair minded man who carries a taste for life’s finer things, an endlessly giving spirit to others and also carries a predilection for the company of older women and finally, who may also be a closeted homosexual. Jack Black performs this character without even one self-knowing wink to the audience. He works completely from the inside out, making this individual feel entirely authentic as well as the embodiment of the townspeople’s wealth of stories and memories. He never treats this man as a joke and never, ever for one instant as a caricature. Black utilizes all of his skills for the role of Bernie Tiede, including his excellent signing voice, which is utilized often in the film for a variety of church hymns, country ballads and spirituals and a couple of local theater show tunes. So appealing is Black, that we are placed within the same position as the Carthage inhabitants as the story takes a dark turn. We feel an odd affection for this very unusual man and more than that, we truly understand him as well. For fear of revealing too much I should not say much more but when you do see this film, I challenge you to tell me that this performance is not Jack Black’s shining moment as an actor. To know that he had this inside of him, makes me anxious to see what else he’s got!

Dear readers, I know that you have all seen “The Avengers” already and for some of you, I would not be surprised if you have seen it two or three times even. Hey, I want to see that film a few more times myself before the end of the summer. But people, trust me, you don’t need to be bludgeoned by the likes of “Battleship.” And frankly, do you really care about anything that occurs in “Men In Black 3”? If you want to see filmmaking excellence, then seek Richard Linklater’s Bernie” out quickly! Films like these need the support of our hard-earned dollar so much more than the big budget pictures that will keep being made regardless.

“Bernie” is more than worth your time and I sincerely hope that you do give this film the chance it richly deserves.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

SAVAGE CINEMA'S BURIED TREASURE: "love jones" (1997)




"love jones" (1997)
Written and Directed by Theodore Witcher

"Black people in love. That's a beautiful thing." -Shadow Henderson
from the film “Mo’ Better Blues” (1990)

The sight of African-Americans in love is indeed a beautiful thing. And certainly, dear readers, you do also know that the sight of anyone in love is a beautiful sight to my eyes, whether in the real world or in the celluloid dreams of the cinema. Unfortunately, the sight of African-Americans in love in the movies is a profoundly disappointing rarity indeed. Dear readers, I want you to sit and think for a few moments about all of the movies you have seen within your lives and just count how many, out of the myriad of love stories released, featured African-American characters front and center, driving the story and the romance. I would dare you to think of ten right off the bat.

The lucratively successful works of Tyler Perry (sorry, not a fan) aside, as he is essentially a one-man industry, Hollywood’s interest in the love lives and experiences of African-Americans has been inexcusable. For me, two films in particular, that explored the relationships of black people in love which resonated with me deeply occurred within the above referenced “Mo’ Better Blues” from Writer/Producer/Director Spike Lee and even more surprisingly, within Writer/Director Cameron Crowe’s seminal “Jerry Maguire” (1996). Where the former depicted a musician’s devotion to his craft at the expense of the relationships around him, the latter film’s romance between football player Rod Tidwell (Cuba Gooding Jr. in his finest performance to date) and his rock solid marital partner Marcy Tidwell (the excellent Regina King), completely informed and supported the romance between the titular Maguire (Tom Cruise) and his loyal assistant Dorothy Boyd (Renee Zellweger), while also existing as a beautifully truthful and honestly felt love story in its own right. Aside from those two provocative stories, what else has there been? Not terribly much.

For this new installment of “Savage Cinema’s Buried Treasure,” I am so excited to point you to a strong feature that understands exactly the tentative nature of falling in love, the games we play with each other that serve to protect our fragile hearts but sadly, undercuts our deepest desires. And yes, it is a film that also happens to display a wonderful African-American cast, including two leading actors who absolutely, positively undeniably could not be more photogenic, appealing, attractive and more in harmony with each other as their pairing is so perfect. The film is “love jones,” the first and, to date, only feature from filmmaker Theodore Witcher. Within the African-American community, “love jones” has rightfully attained a celebrated status as a modern romance classic and several publications from Essence to The Root have also recently written tributes and updates in celebration of the film’s 15th anniversary. If you have seen “love jones,” I enthusiastically suggest that it is time for a revisiting. Yet, if you have never seen this film, the time for you to become acquainted is long overdue and I guarantee it will be more than worth the wait. I have not seen this film since I first saw it perhaps 14 years ago and for whatever mystical reasons why the cinematic fates decided that it was time for me to reunite with this remarkable film. I am forever in their debt.

“love jones” opens with a sequence that suggests a grittier version of Woody Allen's classic opening montage to "Manhattan" (1979). For "love jones," the setting is urban Chicago. The imagery, like "Manhattan," is presented in startling black and white cinematography. Yet, instead of the Gershwin scored elegance of New York, we are given glorious, stark images from the ghettos and the inner cities that to my eye, recalled images from the early 1970s.

From here, "love jones" switches to color and instantly establishes a slow, smoky, romantic and even erotic mood as we are introduced to young photographer Nina Moseley (the jaw droppingly stunning Nia Long), deep in the throes of melancholy heartbreak after an engagement has sadly ended. To make matters even worse, Nina is also nursing the wounds of being recently fired from her photo assistant job. Alongside her frisky and sassy best friend Josie Nichols (Lisa Nicole Carson), Nina ventures out one evening to cool her blues at The Sanctuary, an upscale nightclub specializing in jazz music and spoken word poetry performances.

On this same fateful evening, writer/poet and budding novelist Darius Lovehall (the dashingly charismatic Larenz Tate) is in attendance with his small circle of friends. We are immediately introduced to the not quite happily married Savon Garrison (Isaiah Washington), the romantically cynical and comically “smoove like buttah” cad Hollywood (an excellent Bill Bellamy), Eddie Coles (Leonard Roberts), host at The Sanctuary and record storeowner and romantically levelheaded Shelia (Bernadette Speakes). Romantic lightning strikes at the nightclub bar, where Darius and Nina first meet. So powerfully enraptured by the sight of Nina, Darius quickly performs an impromptu and erotically charged poem for her benefit, hoping that mere words will have her completely succumb to his charms. Not entirely…but Nina is indeed intrigued.

Darius begins his pursuit of Nina, eventually convinces her to a first date at the end of which they have sex. From this point, the love story of Darius Lovehall and Nina Moseley grows more emotionally complex as they each experience the differences, changes and consequences of their romantic actions with each other and most importantly, within themselves.

For all intents and purposes in regards to the actual plot, there is not that much in “love jones” that will surprise you, especially if you happen to be particularly well versed in the genre of romantic comedies and movie love stories. All of the standard beats of the genre are present from the functions of the supporting characters to the stages of Darius and Nina’s romance. Yet, any sense of familiarity is not subjected to becoming a flaw in any conceivable fashion as “love jones” is not a film necessarily about plot but a film about people and behavior. Since this is a film featuring a predominantly African American cast, “love jones” is actually an uncompromisingly fearless film to my eyes as it was released during a period where African American themed films were stagnated in the violent world of cops, killers, and drug dealers left over from Mario Van Peebles' "New Jack City" (1991). In “love jones,” there is absolutely no violence. There are also no gangs and aside from occasional glasses of wine or bottles of beer, there is no narcotic usage whatsoever.

“love jones” is a film which gave audiences a look into part of the African American community and experience barely seen on film--or at least outside of Spike Lee's unapologetically artistic oeuvre and outlook. In some ways, “love jones” could be viewed as a sort of companion piece to Lee’s “Mo’ Better Blues,” as “love jones” focuses its sights upon a slightly younger version of the people who attended a similar artistic venue. In “love jones,” Witcher presents to us, with supreme assistance from Ernest Holzman’s sophisticated cinematography and legendary jazz bassist Darryl Jones’ evocative score, an afro-centric, post-collegiate, urban professional yet almost bohemian world. It feels like the visual representation of the imagery and overall vibe presented in classic hip hop albums by A Tribe Called Quest and De La Soul fused with the timeless and impressionistic jazz of Charlie Parker and "Kind Of Blue" era Miles Davis. It is a film that celebrates all that is vintage as the Chicago of “love jones” is a world of old school record stores and the warmth of vinyl, the joy of discovery inherent in used bookstores, the technique of traditional photographic film and of course, the archaic art and artistry of poetry.

While “love jones” is an unabashedly sexy film, it is most importantly a film that celebrates old school romance. In fact, one of the film’s most sexually charge sequences is when Darius and Nina share an apartment from different rooms and they desperately try to not engage in sex. This is a film that explores how attraction is built through an individual’s connections through art, literature, photography, music and most of all, words.

“Poetry is the possibility of language,” nightclub host Eddie intones during the film and “love jones” is abound with intelligent, heartfelt, luxurious dialogue that completely illuminates all of the characters, their surroundings and their respective stories. Language is a conduit binding one character to each other, all the while building an elevation of the connection between each person to their individual selves. There is one great sequence in particular where Darius and Hollywood engage in an antagonistic verbal duel regarding a sexual transgression. It is simultaneously hilarious and venomous, filled with spitefulness, hurt and a striking amount of self-awareness.

Yet, beyond individual moments within the film, the language illustrates exactly why the love story of Darius and Nina resonated so powerfully with me. Yes, Nia and Darius are indeed attracted to each other physically (and PLEASE, how could they not be?!) but we are witnessing an attraction, sexuality and building love through two like minded people who become more attracted to each other through their respective curiosity and admiration for each other’s intelligence, articulation and world-view.

As previously stated, since “love jones” adheres to the linear structure of the modern romantic film genre, we are given the standard tug of war between love and sex as well as promiscuity and commitment, this film goes several emotional steps deeper. The love story of Darius and Nina contains all of those aforementioned elements but mostly, it is a story where the tug of war exists between these two characters’ individual pasts and potential emotional and therefore adult futures. “love jones” is a film about evolution. It is a film about growing up.

Honestly, dear readers, pleas take some time and think abut all of the love stories that are released from year to year and how, throughout all of the breaking up, making up, getting together and falling apart only to find each other again in the final reel, how very little the characters ever change emotionally. And furthermore, how painfully immature the entire proceedings have been as well. I can say that I have known and still know actual small children and teenagers in the real world who are more emotionally mature than the characters that typically populate these so-called “adult” love stories. That is a tremendous reason why a film like “love jones” should be celebrated and also why the legacy of this film has rightfully endured.

As previously stated Witcher utilizes all of the conventions of the genre yet he circumvents all of those conventions through the deceptively simple act of creating rich, realistic characters living in a realistic world and behaving in a realistic way. Darius Lovehall and Nina Moseley are young adults living young adult lives but what we are witnessing is essentially their very first adult relationship (despite Nina’s past at being previously engaged) and we are completely along for the ride in its growth and development. I really love how the romance between Darius and Nina possesses a fragility from the start, as if you already know about the looming pitfalls but you want to get swept away in the bittersweetness regardless. We understand their every motivation and therefore, every crucial mistake each of them makes in regards to how they pursue each other. We see precisely the games men and women play with themselves and each other to protect themselves emotionally yet ultimately, the games only serve to hurt and confuse each other more than if they were just honest in the first place. Through Darius and Nina, we understand even more about the consequences and emotional realities of sex and what those consequences mean as they fall in love. Moreso, you can see exactly where Darius and Nina make the wrong moves with each other. It simply aches and you wish that you could somehow reach inside the film and stop them from ruining what is obviously the best thing for both of them.

At different points in the film both Darius and Nina dismissively utter the phrase "We just kickin' it," in response to their respective friends when they are each inquired as to the seriousness of their coupling. It is a laissez faire attitude, which only serves as a shield to protect themselves from the world of romantic pain. There was a terrific moment where Savon chides Darius after he has just expressed that Nina just may be “the one.” Like a flash of lightning, Darius deflects it with poetic male bravado only to the walk away and lick his wounds in solitude. Witcher gives us an emotional landscape where people fear even expressing their truest feelings to the ones who love them the most, so they all hide behind the art they love most, serving as more protective shields from crippling emotional disappointments.

Even in the conclusion of the film, which I will not reveal here of course, we not only see what each of them has learned about love and their relationship with love, but how they have each learned and how they will respectively move forward within their lives. It is a relationship that has depth and meaning that goes far beyond the film’s one sheet poster, unlike most cinematic love stories. You want them to be together but you also wish for their respective happiness as they grow for these are characters that truly deserve happiness and our affection for them is deeply earned.

Every performance in the film is pitch perfect. Larenz Tate possesses a sharp, cocky swagger combined with a refreshing intellectual sensitivity. He is much less Lothario and more cut from the boyishly romantic cloth of Romeo. As Nina, Nia Long is more grounded and jaded than the “lost in the clouds” poetic nature of Darius but this is a film where courtship arrives in the form of a long searched for Isley Brothers CD and even she cannot resist the gesture for too long.

Theodore Witcher’s “love jones” is a film of allure and erotic desire but beautifully, it is a story that makes anyone who watches think about the loves of their past and present lives. The loves that could have been, the loves that almost were and above all else the powerful emotions that linger and can still overtake you.

And to think Witcher achieved such a legacy with only one film. Such a shame he has not made any more films since. In a March 2012 interview with the publication The Root, Witcher explained matter of factly, “I intended to have a long list of credits, but I couldn’t get another movie. There has to be something that you want to do that a studio wants to pay for. I was never able to sync that up. I wanted to do ambitious films with more black people. You don’t get to do that.” Sadly, Witcher now refers to his status as a filmmaker as being “semi-retired.”

This painful reality of the 21st century movie business continues to trouble me. While films great and awful will continue to be made year in and year out, the dwindling level of risk taking when it comes to banking upon filmmakers with unique personal creative visions disturbs me tremendously. When everything becomes dumbed down to create broad mass appeal solely in pursuit of the dollar and any artistic intent is an afterthought at best, the purity of the art and artistry of the cinema becomes lost. This goes for all filmmakers from all walks of life of course. But, in the case of Theodore Witcher and African American filmmakers, this reality increasingly creates a world where potentially life altering and supremely entertaining works would never be created at all. At the very least, Witcher was able to create “love jones" and are able to rejoice in its presence time and again. And somehow, the beauteous bittersweetness of “love jones” being Witcher’s one and only film seems to be profoundly fitting.

To each and every one of you, I cannot recommend that you celebrate this film’s 15 anniversary enthusiastically enough but I do hope that this "Buried Treasure" feature gives you an emphatic push in the right direction.