Monday, July 18, 2022

WELCOME TO MY NIGHTMARE: a review of "Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness"

"DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS"
Based upon the Marvel Comics series created by Steve Ditko and Stan Lee

Screenplay Written by Michael Waldron
Directed by Sam Raimi

**1/2 (two and a half stars)
RATED PG 13

It was bound to happen and frankly, I am not surprised that it has not happened even more often. 

My superhero movie fatigue has been long documented upon this site and so, there's no need to rehash everything now. But with regards to the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), I have comes to terms and have grown to largely accept the serialized storytelling approach they have achieved to a miraculous degree overall. The middle to end period of the "Phase Three' sequence of films and stories, which included nothing less than Ryan Coogler's "Black Panther" (2018) as well as Joe and Anthony Russo's extraordinary "Avengers: Infinity War" (2018) and "Avengers: Endgame" (2019) represented a towering culmination of all that had come before. 

With the arrival of "Phase Four," we have already been gifted with Destin Daniel Cretton's wonderful "Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings" (2021) and Jon Watts' absolutely tremendous "Spider-Man: No Way Home" (2021), both of which worked independently and in conjunction with all of the new forays into the extended storylines depicted in the Marvel television series. With Matt Shakman's "WandaVision" (2021), Kari Skogland's "The Falcon and the Winter Soldier" (2021), Kate Herron's "Loki" (2021) and Rhys Thomas and Bert & Bertie's "Hawkeye" (2021), I was thoroughly engaged with the elongated storytelling that expanded all that we had previously experienced as well as explored a post Thanos existence with creativity, pathos, sorrow, and the rightful sense of global PTSD. 

With few exceptions, the MCU has become especially thrilling to me and with the gradual arrival of the multiverse and the full emergence of next great threat Kang The Conqueror on the horizon, the reservations that I harbored have largely dissipated...

...sort of.

As good to great Marvel has been as of late, there is still the factor of assembly line moviemaking to contend with and how having so many projects in the proverbial pipeline, and all working together to create a larger narrative, something at some point is bound to stumble. And unfortunately, that stumble has now arrived.

Sam Raimi's "Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness" has long been billed as being Marvel first horror film, so to speak. Yes indeed, we do receive the pre-requisite jump scares and sequences of surprising, sudden shocks of graphic violence (PG 13 comic book styled, of course) but that being said, the film is nowhere near as inventive, dazzling, frightening or as maddening as it could have been. That being said, it is not for Raimi's lack of trying as he is indeed working like the devil to keep all of the conceptual plates spinning in the air.  But, honestly, there is only so much even the very best filmmakers can do when racing to complete a film before the pre-announced release date. And truthfully, and especially with this high caliber work Marvel has been producing recently, all parties involved, deserve better. 

Opening a short time after the events of "Spider-Man: No Way Home," we reunite with Doctor Stephen Strange (again played by Benedict Cumberbatch) trapped in the throes of an adrenalized nightmare in which he and a plucky teenager named America Chavez (played by Xochitl Gomez) are being relentlessly pursued by a demon intent upon stealing America's powers to travel through and manipulate the multiverse. But, was it a nightmare...

In the so-called waking world, Doctor Strange soon meets, or is reunited, with America during a battle with another demon intent upon capturing the teen. Upon noticing witch craft runes, Strange decides to consult the grieving Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen), living in isolation after the devastating events depicted within "WandaVision." Strange soon discovers that Wanda has not only been overtaken by the influence of The Book Of The Damned, known as The Darkhold, the book has also fully transformed Wanda into The Scarlet Witch and she is the one behind the attacks against America Chavez, leading to a relentless pursuit throughout the multiverse.

Sam Raimi's "Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness" functions like a technicolor fever dream. Vibrantly psychedelic and kaleidoscopic, certainly but also noisy, fussy, frantic, chaotic, and messy, definitely. Granted, the odds were stacked against this film considerably as Directors were swapped and therefore, Raimi's production time was truncated due to the switch as well as the Covid-19 shut down, plus all of the reportedly extensive re-shoots. All of that being said, it is amazing when a movie gets itself made under normal circumstances but for one as fraught with difficulties as this one, it is admirable that Raimi delivered a final result in time for the film's release...even though the entire film looks and feels as if he was building the plane while flying it.  

Of course, there is much to admire. The pre-requisite MCU spit and polish is firmly in place. Performances are strong throughout, with Elizabeth Olsen as the clear MVP and I will speak to that shortly. Conceptually, I loved the idea that dreams and nightmares are in fact passages to multiverse existences and not fantasy at all. The Scarlet Witch's ability to Dreamwalk through and control multiverse existences was another aspect that really intrigued me greatly, I loved the concept of the Incursion-when multiverse realities collide and disintegrate. There was more than enough conceptually to work with and utilize to surprisingly and, in sticking with the film's title, to really work us over psychologically as well as function as a superb horror film, much like the source material which did give me nightmares as a child, strong enough where I gave the comic series a wide berth. And still, by film's end, it all felt to be a series of missed opportunities.  

I think back to "Spider-Man: No Way Home" and how the concept of theme multiverse was handled, presented and executed as it was indeed a magical merging of storytelling, emotional heft, dire issues of fate and consequences plus fan service that was supremely earned. I look to both "WandaVision" and "Loki," where the dizzying concepts of alternate, multiverse realities and variant personalities, The Time Variance Authority (TVA) and the overall destruction of the Sacred Timeline thus unleashing the soon to be revealed dangers of Kang The Conqueror made for mesmerizing, captivating, cathartic  viewing. 

With regards to Sam Raimi's "Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness, we are given elements of pathos, some better than others. For Stephen Strange, I suppose the take away is that he is a figure confronted with the limits of his own arrogances as every multiverse incarnation Strange confronts is one who has been defeated in one way or an other. It is as if in this film, Strange is serving as Marvel's George Bailey in essence, exploring existence and his place within it or without him. Compelling in theory but it never sticks to the cinematic ribs, so to speak. Benedict Cumberbatch is perfectly suited for the titular role as Doctor Strange but even so, I had wished the screenplay did not let an actor of his skills down so much and so often as he really has not terribly much to do...and due to that, I know that I was nowhere near as invested as I should have been in a story such as this one.

Now Elizabeth Olsen on the other hand, as previously stated, walks away with the entire film, flaws and all. It seems that despite all of the storytelling potholes and poor tonal sifts, Olsen as Wanda and furthermore, as The Scarlet Witch continued to create a powerful swan dive into the ocean of grief and loss, which for her possesses no bottom  Granted, if you have not seen "WandaVision,"  you will be missing a massive amount of intensely crucial set up for the events of this film--in addition to one of the very best performances seen within the MCU in the service of one of the series most tragic characters.  

With Raimi's film, Wanda's trauma has been transformed into a righteous rage that does brilliantly set her up to become a formidable "villain" but an adversary that is rooted in grave pain congealed with a fury that does indeed strike at the heart of the unfairness and even implied sexism Wanda has faced throughout her adventures with the Avengers. 

"You break the rules and become a hero," Wanda states sharply to Strange early in the film. "I do it and I become the enemy. That doesn't seem fair." At its very best, and for so often during the entire MCU saga, the humanity of the characters has far outweighed any of the pyrotechnics. It is within those three lines that we understand nearly everything that we need to know about this stage of Wanda's trajectory as well as how it has informed and re-contextualized everything that we knew about her previously. I really think that Raimi comes dangerously close to merely demonizing her yet Elizabeth Olsen's performance is what makes Wanda/The Scarlet Witch roar.  

Yet, with Sam Raimi's film overall...sigh...Where was the sense of awe? Or confusion? Or psychological terror? Or...well...honestly, that sense of madness that is presented in the film's own title? Yes, there is one terrific sequence of Doctor Strange and America Chavez hurtling through one universe after another, but all told, Raimi seems to have no thoughts about these universes other than visual...and briefly at that. Yes, indeed this is a PG 13 movie and Raimi can only go so far (and I believe that he certainly did within one particularly gruesome sequence of superhero carnage) but everything feels so glib and unsurprising. 

Absolutely no one seems to be remotely phased by the existence of the multiverse or when characters from one universe meet similar characters who exist in a parallel universe. Everything is so matter of fact, so everyday and without any sense of real danger, excitement, or intensity, It often just feels like the actors are only walking from set to set or just standing upon one set with CGI backgrounds ever changing without any real consequences and in a story where things just happen

The typically strong Marvel storytelling was considerably messier this time around to the point where I am wondering if it was a glaring plot hole if the events at the conclusion of "Spider-Man: No Way Home" were understood correctly.

Sam Raimi's "Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness," while not a bad film by any stretch, it one that doesn't sink inwards, doesn't really disturb, and it is a film that often felt like it was being written each day in order to meet the pre-ordained release date. In fact, this film's shortcoming only showcase how strong the Marvel television series actually are as they have worked wonders for the Marvel characters by having the time to stretch and add layers and textures, making for more satisfying experiences. 

Doctor Strange deserves so much more than a rush job and unfortunately, that is precisely what this film is. 

Sunday, July 10, 2022

FLYING OFF OF THE RAINBOW BRIDGE: a review of "Thor: Love And Thunder"

"THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER"
Based upon the Marvel Comics series created by Jack Kirby, Stan Lee & Larry Lieber
Screenplay Written by Taika Waititi & Jennifer Kaytin Robinson
Directed by Taika Waititi
** 1/2 (two and a half stars)
RATED PG 13

When is it ever too much of a good thing?

With the ever continuing and expanding Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), that very question has been asked a myriad amount of times by now as the assembly line production of movies and television shows does beg to be inquired. I have gone through my varying feelings about the sheer amount of product that has emerged over these past 14 years and I have now grown accustomed to the serialized storytelling plus my still continued feelings that the Marvel output overall has been consistently good to great with some hiccups here and there. 

That being said, I am strongly feeling that while the television slate of the MCU, under the leadership of Producer Kevin Feige, has been thrilling, innovative and captivating, the motion pictures as of late have not shown the same consistency of attentive care and execution. Yes, the films are as ravishing as ever. But the actual storytelling and therefore, that emotional connection, which makes this series one you wish to keep returning to, is feeling rushed, strained and just existing to keep the Marvel pipeline surging ahead. Frankly, for me, after the majesty of Jon Watts' "Spider-Man: No Way Home" (2021), one of the very best the MCU has ever released, it is inexcusable to me to watch Marvel produce anything sub par. They can't go back, nor should they and when they do, it does force the question that opened this posting to be asked. 

Taika Waititi's  "Thor: Love And Thunder," or titular hero's fourth solo adventure and the MCU's 29th feature overall, is overflowing with artistic vision and one that carries an especially surprising Directorial personality in Waititi as the Marvel aesthetic has been emphasized more than a filmmaker's personal stamp. Even so, it was two exceedingly full hours of wild razzle dazzle, nonsense and Guns N' Roses that ultimately left me feeling underwhelmed to the point where I was curious if there even was a point to it other than commerce driven.  

When we last saw The God Of Thunder (again winningly played by Chris Hemsworth), he had boarded a starship alongside The Guardians Of The Galaxy (all of whom make an appearance) after the defeat of Thanos, resurrecting half of the universe in the process and bidding final farewells to Tony Stark, Natasha Ramonoff and Steve Rogers. Through these tumultuous life altering events, which had already endured the death of his Father, Odin, the destruction of Asgard and the creation of New Asgard upon  Earth with Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson) entrusted as the new King, our very own Thor feels soulfully wayward, as well as still nursing a broken heart from his breakup with Dr. Jane Foster (Natalie Portman).  

Meanwhile, certain doom has re-emerged, yet this time, in the form of Gorr The God Butcher (Christian Bale) and the arachnid styled demons of his dreaded Shadow Realm. Gorr, armed with the Necrosword, is intent upon murdering all of the Gods, even as he is cursed by the object. with New Asgard as his next target, Gorr apprehends all of the Asgardian children as bait for Thor, who clearly will need all of the assistance he can find for this battle...

...which includes...the return of Dr. Jane Foster, now as The Mighty Thor (not Lady Thor, thank you very much) armed with the mystical and thought to be forever destructed hammer Mjolnir.

Just as with Taika Waititi's resplendent "Thor: Ragnarok" (2017), "Thor: Love And Thunder" is an orgiastic display of rainbow colored drenched sound, fury and irreverence that proudly never takes itself too seriously, if at all, and is almost determined to try and see how far it can push the Marvel envelope without flying completely off of the Rainbow Bridge. But, boy does it come dangerously close.

Taika Waititi's puckish approach, so welcome and unexpected in "Raganarok," felt that somehow he snuck something past Feige's watchful overseeing MCU eye and in doing so, fully rejuvenated and repurposed a character that never entirely had itself settled as to how it could exist, despite Chris Hemsworth's absolutely perfect casting and clear enthusiasm for the role. "Ragnarok" found Hemsworth and Thor as their most comfortable, treading that very fine line between heroism, pathos and sheer ridiculousness that showcased Hemsworth's considerable abilities (most notably his terrific comedic touch) and broadened the dimensions of Thor himself, making him a character we would love to follow to the ends of the universe and beyond. 

With "Love And Thunder," Taika Waititi and Chris Hemsworth truly make a dream team as their sensibilities feel to line up perfectly as they each simultaneously honor and send up our hero to mischievously delicious delight. Additionally, Natalie Portman is clearly having a blast as both Dr. Jane Foster and as the hammer wielding Mighty Thor, just nailing a heretofore untapped charm as her Earthbound Scientist combined with an existential rise and despair, all the while battling foes with the best of our Asgardian heroes and heroines and ever seeking the perfect catchphrase for herself. The magnetic Tessa Thompson owns her role as the swaggering warrior King Valkyrie, making her union with both Hemsworth and Portman a veritable dream team. 

But...oh, if they were just given even more to do...  

While "Love And Thunder" more than indulges Taika Waititi's relentless imagination and stunning visual dynamism, which feels even more unfiltered with a story that sprawls itself from Earth all the way to Zeus's (a more than game Russell Crowe) Omnipresent City, Gorr's Shadow Realm and the ends of Eternity itself fueled by operatic and comedic overtones of romance, sexual friskiness and fluidity, and the dives into the ocean of love (to think, even Thor's axe Stormbreaker can feel pangs of jealousy). 

I deeply appreciated Waititi's restless urgency to seemingly try anything at all to keep those cinematic plates spinning vibrantly, rather than creating another anonymous big budget blockbuster. Yet, while that approach served him exceedingly well in "Ragnarok," he seemed considerably more out of control this time around. It doesn't mean that he needed to be necessarily reined in. It means that I just had wished that greater care was taken with the story and actual storytelling, therefore setting whatever boundaries needed to be in place for him to work within and push. Instead, Waititi was poking us in the eye every single second, which really overstays its welcome even while enjoying it. For if everything is essentially a joke, then why should we care about anything that happens at all?   

The love story of Thor and Jane only succeeds due to Hemsworth and Portman's chemistry and ease with each other combined with what we already know about the duo from previous Marvel entries and not really due to anything Waititi brings to the table, aside from some sweet montage moments. Even Christian Bale felt to be underused, which is a serious misfire, because when he is on screen, he exudes as much pathos as creepiness and truthfully, if you are going to have a character named Gorr The God Butcher, shouldn't we see a figure that more than lives up to his moniker?  

To that end, all of the character motivations felt rushed, in a screenplay hat felt to be barely written, so that they never fully resonated and existed solely to get to the next scene, thus, and again, undervaluing the film as a whole and threatening to make the MCU experience tiresome rather than enthralling.

Certainly, when producing a slate of material on an assembly line such as Marvel's, quality control is bound to miss once in a while. Yet with Sam Raimi's undercooked, over rushed missed opportunity which was "Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness" and now followed by Taika Waititi's "Thor: Love And Thunder," I am admittedly getting nervous going forward, especially as Ryan  Coogler's long awaited "Black Panther 2: Wakanda Forever" is set to arrive by the holiday season.  

Tighten it up, Marvel.  For we need a reason to return to the MCU other than because it simply exists.